Sunday, July 10, 2011

Tips and Pointers from Sue

 Hello Readers,


   Just taking a moment to update you on some changes that may affect you.  Hope you are enjoying your summer....

1) IRS Notice: FUTA tax rate for 2011. The FUTA tax rate will remain at 6.2% through June 30, 2011. The tax rate is scheduled to decrease to 6.0% beginning July , 2011.

2) Labor Law Posters: If you run a business and have employees, you are required to post the federal and state labor laws by hanging a “labor law poster” in your employee work room or break room. You can order these posters through many on-line companies or through the department of labor.  Contact our office if you have any questions about this requirement.

Sue Lewis
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Tax Law Keeps S Corporations Attractive

One fortunate outcome of the 2010 Tax Relief Act is that it keeps the top individual income tax rate almost 5 percentage points lower than the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate. The difference between individual and corporate tax rates is one of the incentives for organizing as an S corporation.

Taxes are really the primary consideration when deciding whether to organize a small business as an S corporation. But some businesses may find that the costs of complying with Subchapter S of Chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code could offset the tax advantages. It’s important to weigh the cost of these requirements against the potential benefits of incorporating.

Tax Returns, but No Taxes

S corporations are rarely subject to a corporate income tax; rather, their profits (and losses) are passed through to shareholders, who are taxed at the lower individual income tax rates. (A recent decision in Japan to cut the corporate tax rate by five percentage points means that the United States could have the highest effective corporate tax rate in the world.)1–2

Despite their potential lack of tax liability, S corporations must still file tax Tax PreparationImage by agrilifetoday via Flickr
returns. They must also file certain legal documents and maintain a board of directors, who must meet on a regular basis and approve the company’s major transactions. Some states impose additional requirements, fees, and taxes on S corporations.

Separate but Shared

An S corporation is usually treated as a separate entity from its shareholders. This means the shareholders generally cannot be held liable for the corporation’s debts (except in cases of misconduct). Shares can be exchanged between existing, new, or even deceased shareholders without disrupting operations or dividing the firm’s assets (the number of shareholders is limited to 100).

S corporations also may have access to attractive benefit plans, which could help remove some of the disadvantages of competing against larger corporations in the job market. Reorganizing as an S corporation could offer some appealing tax benefits, but it also has the potential to be time-consuming and expensive. Weighing the trade-offs may help you decide whether incorporating would be a smart move.

1) The New York Times, December 13, 2010
2) The Wall Street Journal, December 29, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek an Accountant in Naperville or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 1, 2011

Current Economic Conditions and the Prospect of Inflation

The Consumer Price Index (CPI), a common measure of inflation, grew at a 3.2% annual rate in April, the fastest rate since October 2008.1 For more than two years, the U.S. economy has experienced relatively low inflation, and the current rate remains below the 50-year average.2 Yet anyone who has been to a gas station or a grocery store recently may feel that prices are going up faster than the CPI suggests.

The CPI measures price changes in a market basket of consumer goods and services. Because prices for food and energy are generally more volatile than other prices, a narrower index called the “core CPI” excludes them. Core inflation, which is used by policymakers as an indicator of long-term inflation trends, grew at an annual rate of just 1.3% in April.3 This suggests that the recent increase in general inflation is due mainly to rising food and oil prices, wh
New York Stock Exchange on Wall Street in New ...Image via Wikipedia
ich have yet to work their way fully into prices for other goods and services.

A Slow-Growth Economy

Inflation is typically a by-product of economic growth. When an economy is growing, more people are working, spending money, and competing for a limited supply of goods and services, which can cause upward pressure on prices.

But things are a little different right now. Prices are rising during a period of slow economic growth. Political unrest in oil-producing nations in the Middle East and Africa has contributed to rising oil prices. Because oil is needed to produce most goods and services, higher oil prices can drive up the cost of doing business, which can cause companies to cut spending and payroll, pass higher costs on to their customers, accept lower profits, or some combination thereof. By one estimate, a $10 increase in the price of a barrel of oil reduces gross domestic product growth by 0.2 percentage points.4

Prices for important food crops have surged over the past year — corn was up 88%, wheat was up 76%, and soybeans were up 37% — not only because of growing demand from economies that are recovering faster than the U.S. economy, but also because higher oil prices are spurring demand for ethanol made from corn. These three grains are used in a multitude of food products, which could be why the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that food prices will jump between 3% and 4% in 2011 — whereas food inflation in 2010 was at its lowest rate since 1962.5 Food may play an even more critical role in the economy than oil. There are ways to cut back on energy use, but everyone needs to eat.

And then there are the problems in Japan, the world’s third largest economy.6 While this wealthy and productive nation struggles to recover from an earthquake, a tsunami, and a nuclear crisis — estimated to be the costliest natural disaster on record — the world will struggle to get by without Japanese exports (including 25% of the world’s silicon chips) and cope with reduced consumer demand from Japan’s citizens until they get their lives back on track.7 Although there may be a construction boom in Japan, it will likely consume resources that supported other industries. One bright side is that Japan may use less oil in the near future, which could help bring down prices.

Limited Means

Unfortunately, when inflation is caused by something other than economic growth, policymakers may have limited means to combat it. The Federal Reserve’s typical response to inflation is to raise interest rates, in effect putting a brake on economic growth. But higher oil and food prices can also slow the economy, so raising interest rates might only make matters worse.

If you lived through the 1970s, you may recall the term stagflation, which was coined by economists to describe an unprecedented period in which the economy was experiencing a combination of slow growth, high inflation, and rising unemployment. The stagflation of the 1970s may have been caused by extreme oil price increases in the early 70s. It wasn’t until the Federal Reserve raised interest rates into the double digits that the cycle of stagflation was broken, but the Fed was blamed for causing a deep recession in the process.8

How Does Inflation Affect You?

It’s not clear whether the U.S. economy is entering a period of higher inflation. There are signs that the rise in energy and food prices may be slowing. The 3.3% rise in gas prices in April was the smallest increase since November 2010, and the 0.4% increase in food prices was half that of March.9 A drop in energy and food prices might free up more income for discretionary consumer purchases, which could help stimulate the economy.

But even a low inflation rate can pose risks to your finances over long periods. Consider that a 3% inflation rate could cut the spending power of a dollar in half in 24 years, according to the Rule of 72. Failing to account for inflation when projecting how much income you expect to need in retirement could cause you to set aside too little of your current income or invest too conservatively. By the time you reach retirement age, it could be too late to fix the problem.

The relatively low inflation rate the United States has enjoyed over the past few years may have lulled you into believing that inflation does not pose a long-term risk. If your long-term outlook doesn’t account for the risk of inflation, it may be time to consider adjustments that may help your portfolio keep pace with rising prices.

1, 3) Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 13, 2011
2) Thomson Reuters, 2011 (Consumer Price Index for the period 12/31/1960 to 12/31/2010)
4, 7) The Wall Street Journal, March 24, 2011
5) The Wall Street Journal, February 25, 2011
6) International Monetary Fund, 2011
8) Investopedia, 2011
9) msnbc.com, May 13, 2011

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek Naperville Financial Planning an/or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Debating the Debt Ceiling

Over the past few months, there has been substantial debate in Congress over raising the ceiling on the national debt. This is an important discussion, but it is hardly new — Congress has raised the debt ceiling 74 times since 1962.1
Unofficial seal of the United States CongressImage via Wikipedia

The debt ceiling is actually more of a legislative formality than a barrier to government spending. The current debate may be driven in part by the fact that the national debt is approaching the psychologically important milestone of 100% of gross domestic product for the first time since World War II. In contrast, 10 years ago, the debt was less than 60% of GDP.2

Government spending and borrowing affect all taxpayers, so it’s worthwhile to keep track of what happens in Washington. Although many Americans could be adversely affected if Congress decided not to increase the debt ceiling, this is unlikely to happen.

Why Does the Government Have a Debt Limit?

The debt ceiling is the federal government’s legal limit for borrowing money. It was established in 1917 to help finance America’s involvement in World War I. Up to that time, federal borrowing and debt limits were usually tied to specific projects.3

Why have a debt ceiling if Congress just raises it every time the national debt approaches the limit? Checks and balances. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to appropriate money and the executive branch the power to spend it. The debt ceiling is one way for Congress to control the amount of money the U.S. Treasury — an arm of the executive branch — can borrow by selling bonds to investors. Each time the national debt reaches the debt ceiling, Congress and the president must have a public debate over the need to spend more than the government collects in tax revenues. Sometimes the debate takes place quietly; at other times, it captures national attention.

What Happens If the Debt Ceiling Is Not Raised?

Once the national debt hits the debt ceiling, the Treasury can no longer borrow. Because most federal budgets require deficit spending, the government might not be able to pay all of its obligations. This has never happened in the United States, so it’s unclear how the Treasury would be required to prioritize its bill payments.

If the government were unable to pay its obligations, investor confidence in U.S. government debt could be reduced and the government would probably have to pay higher interest rates to compensate for the perceived additional risk. The federal budget is already tight (as evidenced by the need to borrow in excess of tax revenues), so higher interest payments could displace other federal spending priorities and require additional borrowing. Because the interest rates offered by the federal government influence other interest rates, a rate increase could translate to higher borrowing costs for state and local governments, businesses, and consumers.

Among the many people in the United States who rely on the federal government for income are Social Security beneficiaries, civilian and military employees, and federal contractors and their employees. If payments to these individuals were to cease, they may be forced to curtail their spending, which could ripple through the private sector.

U.S. Treasury securities are guaranteed by the federal government as to the timely payment of principal and interest, which is why they tend to appeal to investors seeking income and preservation of principal. A significant portion of the federal debt is held by foreign investors, so if the Treasury were unable to honor its obligations, it could have a global effect.

Of course, there could be some benefits to a reduction in federal borrowing: Capital that previously went to finance government spending could be freed up for investment in the private sector. The percentage of the federal budget consumed by interest payments could fall. The less the government has to borrow, the less reason it may have to justify tax increases. However, although simply capping the federal debt limit might seem like an easy way to stop Washington from spending more than it collects in tax revenues, a federal government that is unable to pay its bills is more likely to cause hardship than reform.

Obviously, the federal government cannot continue to borrow indefinitely, but we can expect Congress to keep raising the debt ceiling until longer-term fiscal challenges are addressed. The debt ceiling is important, but don’t let it distract you from pursuing your own fiscal health and long-term financial goals.

The principal value of Treasury securities fluctuates with market conditions. If not held to maturity, they could be worth more or less than the original amount paid.

1–3) Congressional Research Service, 2011

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent Accounting firm in Naperville. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Fixed for Life

More than 40% of Americans ages 36 and older are at risk of running out of money in retirement, according to a retirement readiness study.

Researchers divided working Americans into four groups, ranging from the lowest to the highest income levels. They found that, even though the risk of running out of money decreases with a higher pre-retirement income, almost one-third of people with upper-middle incomes and 13% with high incomes may not be able to pay for basic retirement expenses and uninsured health-care costs after two decades in retirement.1

The risk of running out of money doesn’t appear to be reduced for people who h
Generation X - Original Article (Photocopy) - ...Image by Jason Michael via Flickr
ave more time to prepare for retirement: Baby boomers and Generation Xers are almost equally at risk.2

Fortunately, it’s possible to purchase an insurance product that could pay an income for a specified period, including your lifetime or the lifetimes of you and another person. The guaranteed retirement income available from a fixed annuity could be just the fix you’re looking for.

Fund Your Future Income

A fixed annuity is a contract with an insurance company that guarantees a fixed rate of return during the life of the contract. The type of annuity that may be appropriate for you will depend on your situation.

An immediate annuity is typically funded with a lump-sum premium. Payments start soon thereafter and continue for the duration of the contract. This type of annuity is often purchased at the beginning of retirement.

A deferred annuity can be funded with either a lump-sum premium or a series of payments over time. Payments start at some point in the future at a rate that reflects any tax-deferred growth during the accumulation period. The income amount depends on the amount of the initial contract, the contract’s rate of return, the age of the contract holder, and the number of years over which payments will be received.

Annuity Trade-Offs

Generally, annuities have contract limitations, fees, and expenses. They tend to offer more conservative rates of return than the financial markets because the insurance company is responsible for paying the contract’s stated return, regardless of market conditions. Of course, any guarantees are contingent on the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company.

Most annuities have surrender charges that are assessed during the early years of the contract if the annuity is surrendered. Distributions of annuity earnings are taxed as ordinary income. Withdrawals prior to age 59½ may be subject to a 10% federal income tax penalty.

If you are concerned about running out of money in retirement, it might be time to consider a fixed annuity. A stable source of income could be a welcome addition to your portfolio.

1–2) Employee Benefit Research Institute, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek a Naperville Accountant or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, June 17, 2011

Giving the Gift of Knowledge

College BoardImage via Wikipedia
If you’re wondering whether a college education is still a good investment, consider this: The overall unemployment rate reached as high as 9.9% in 2010, but for workers with a bachelor’s degree (or higher), it did not exceed 5.1%.1 Workers with a bachelor’s degree earn more, too — an average of 66% more over a lifetime than workers who completed only high school.2

But a college education can be expensive. For the 2010–11 school year, the average cost of tuition, fees, and room and board at public four-year colleges ranged from $16,140 to $28,130, depending on whether the student qualified for in-state tuition. At private four-year colleges, the average cost was close to $37,000.3 Because these are current costs, you can expect the price tag to be higher in the future. Over the past decade, the cost of attending a public college grew almost 6% faster than the rate of inflation.4

Accumulating assets to pay for college can be a daunting task. A Section 529 plan offers a tax-advantaged way to accumulate money for a child’s or grandchild’s education.
Smart Savings

Section 529 plans are state-sponsored or college-sponsored plans designed to help families save for higher-education costs. Investment earnings accumulate on a tax-deferred basis, and withdrawals are tax-free as long as they are used for qualified higher-education expenses. For withdrawals not used for qualified higher-education expenses, earnings are subject to ordinary income taxes (at the donor’s tax rate) plus a 10% federal income tax penalty.
Big Plan on Campus

Enjoying rising popularity, Section 529 savings plans have grown from an estimated 300,000 accounts in 2000 to nearly 9 million in 2009, the latest year for which figures are available.5

Donors are not restricted by income limits and may contribute up to $13,000 ($26,000 for married couples) per student in 2011 without triggering gift taxes. It’s also possible to contribute up to $65,000 ($130,000 for married couples) in a single year, as long as the donor doesn’t make any other gifts to the student for five years.

As with other investments, there are generally fees and expenses associated with participation in a 529 savings plan. In addition, there are no guarantees regarding the performance of the underlying investments. The tax implications of a 529 savings plan should be discussed with your legal and/or tax advisors because they can vary significantly from state to state. Also be aware that most states offer their own 529 plans, which may provide advantages and benefits exclusively for their residents and taxpayers.

If you want to help a loved one attend college, you might consider a 529 savings plan. It’s a gift that may offer lasting value.

Before investing in a 529 savings plan, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully. The official disclosure statements and applicable prospectuses, which contain this and other information about the investment options and underlying investments, can be obtained by contacting your financial professional. You should read this material carefully before investing.

1) Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010
2–4) The College Board, 2010
5) Investment Company Institute, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent Naperville Education Planning tax advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 13, 2011

Help an Inheritance Help You


Americans may be changing their attitudes following the Great Recession. When asked what they would do with a large inheritance, 48% of Americans said they would save it. Only 8% would spend it on things they’ve always wanted.1

These findings might seem surprising, but bear in mind that most of the respondents were probably not actually handling an inheritance at the time of the survey. An inheritance can often be accompanied by a mix of emotions that can be difficult to imagine or anticipate. Grief, excitement, and gratefulness are understandable feelings, but emotion is a frequent enemy of sound decision making.

If you expect to receive, or have already received, an inheritance, it’s usually a good idea not to act right away but to spend some time deciding how to use it to pursue your long-term goals. This may help reduce the role that emotions play in your decisions. Here are some options to consider.

Invest It

Investing represents an opportunity to grow an inheritance and potentially make it last for years. But it’s important to view any potential investment in light of your overall financial situation. If you inherit a large sum, consider how it could influence your overall investment strategy. Depending on your circumstances, a large sum could affect your risk tolerance.
Pay Down Debt

Credit cards can be useful to rent a car or book an airline flight, but carrying large balances on high-interest accounts can harm your financial health. If you have a large balance on a credit card or a vehicle loan, consider paying it off with the inherited money and use the increased cash flow to begin making “payments” toward your retirement or other long-term goals.

Of course, some types of debt, such as a home mortgage, may offer tax advantages. Whether it would be wise for you to pay off your mortgage depends on your individual circumstances and goals.

Give Some Away

Under current law, you can make gifts of up to $13,000 per beneficiary per year without incurring gift taxes. A gift of that size could help fund a college education for a child or grandchild, help a family member get out of debt, or give a young worker in your family a head start on retirement savings. Also, you can give an unlimited amount to your spouse without gift taxes as long as he or she is a U.S. citizen.

Save for Emergencies

It’s usually wise to have an emergency fund that can be used in the event of a sudden loss of income or unexpected expenses. Having three to six months’ worth of income in an emergency fund could help you avoid going into debt or selling investments at an inopportune time to cover unanticipated or sudden expenses.

Inheriting money represents an opportunity. But it may help to view it as a responsibility, too. Managing your inheritance with sound financial strategies could help you preserve it for your future and your family.

1) Gallup, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as Naperville estate planning or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Never Retire? Don’t Count on It

If there is anyone who shouldn’t have to worry about retirement, one might assume it would be the wealthy. But in a recent survey, just 40% of wealthy individuals “completely agree” that they are “totally confident” they will have enough money for retirement.1

And the rest? Apparently, most of them have decided they aren’t going to worry about it: 60% said they will shun traditional retirement and work as long as possible. The percentage rises to 70% among those ages 45 and younger.2

Of course, there’s nothing wrong with wanting to work for your whole life. Work can be a source of satisfaction and other benefits. It’s been shown that people who work later in life may be less likely to suffer cognitive decline than people who retire early.3 And for people concerned about their finances, working longer may make sense: The amount of time to accumulate money increases, while the duration of retirement decreases.

But it can be dangerous to believe that you can overcome a retirement income shortfall by telling yourself that you will work past the traditional retirement age or never re
Various Federal Reserve Notes, c.1995. Only th...Image via Wikipedia
tire at all. Here’s why.

Since 1991, the median retirement age has remained at or near 62.4 The percentage of workers who expect to retire after age 65 has tripled over the past two decades — from 11% in 1991 to 33% in 2010.5 But the ages at which most people retire haven’t changed as dramatically. In 1991, 79% of retirees left the workforce before age 65; in 2010, it was 61%.6

Many people are forced to retire early. In 2010, 41% of retirees stopped working earlier than they expected to. This is not unusual. Since 2000, the percentage of people who retired earlier than planned in a given year has varied between 36% and 51%. Certainly, some people (24%) retire early because they can afford to, but just 5% gave only positive reasons for doing so. The most common reasons for retiring ahead of schedule were poor health (54%), work-related reasons including downsizing and closure (37%), and the need to care for a spouse or family member (19%).7

Working in retirement is not as common as you might think. In 2010, 70% of workers were expecting to work for pay in retirement. Despite this high level of determination, only 23% of retirees were actually working.8

Believing that you will work forever or retire late in life could lull you into a false sense of security. You may be tempted to save less and spend more today because there is no urgent need to prepare for tomorrow. But if something unfortunate happens — or you change your mind when you get older — you could find yourself retired anyway, possibly with less money than you need.

There’s nothing wrong with ignoring tradition and choosing a life path that keeps you always engaged and challenged. But recognizing that you may not always be able to work and earn an income might help you make decisions that keep more of your options open.

1–2) Financial Planning, September 27, 2010
3) The New York Times, October 11, 2010
4–8) Employee Benefit Research Institute, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as retirement planning or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, June 3, 2011

Building A Business Versus Building Wealth

The market for small businesses has been less than ideal over the past few years. In the third quarter of 2010, just 1,117 small businesses were sold in the United States. That’s equal to the number sold in the same period in 2009 but down from the 1,462 that sold in the third quarter of 2008. Half of businesses sold during the third quarter of 2010 were listed for more than $245,000, but the average sales price was about $140,000 – a 6% decline from the same period in 2009.1


Many of the reasons for the lackluster market may be due to external forces: Weak economic conditions mean many businesses are earning less than in years past. Tighter lending standards have reduced the pool of eligible buyers. Qualified buyers may be waiting for a stronger economy before they assume additional risk.

In other words, your efforts to build a successful business may not always translate to an increase in personal wealth.

One way to help insulate your personal financial situation from the fluctuating small-business market is by investing outside your company. Doing so can have some important benefits.

If you were forced to sell unexpectedly, perhaps because of an illness or a partner’s departure, your post-business lifestyle wouldn’t fully depend on the sales price.

You might be better able to withstand low-ball offers or a buyer’s market if you are in a position to wait for the right buyer.

Think of it as diversification. Allocating too much of your personal wealth to one company — even your own — is a risky proposition. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of investment loss; it is a method used to help manage investment risk.

It’s natural to want to believe that the effort and dedication you pour into your business will help increase the selling price, but there’s always the risk that it won’t. Call today to learn more about how to help insulate your financial future from the risks facing your business.

(1) The Wall Street Journal, October 14, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as Naperville Accounting or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 30, 2011

Protect Your Business with a Disaster Readiness Plan

Prepare for Disruptions — Even from Faraway Events

About a year ago, a volcano erupting in Iceland virtually shut down air travel in Europe. Thousands of flights were canceled, stranding travelers and grounding the 11,000 tons of goods that are normally flown daily between Asia and Europe.1 Businesses suddenly faced shortages of goods and materials because of a faraway natural disaster — a reminder of the need to prepare for a range of emergencies.

Your company may have been unaffected by the Icelandic volcano, but the risk of disaster is always looming. Most people think of hurricanes, tornados, and earthquakes, but a fire in the break room or a flood in the warehouse can also cause operations to come to a grinding halt. By one estimate, one-quarter of businesses never reopen after a major calamity.2 Taking some basic steps now could help you avoid a similar fate.

Stay covered. Even though you probably have insurance, it’s important that your coverage keeps pace with company changes. Updating your policy as you add equipment and other capital expenditures may help you reduce uninsured losses.
CatástrofeImage via Wikipedia

Point and shoot. Taking photographs of premises and property may help speed up the claims process and reduce the risk of disputes with the insurer. Backing up the photos online can help protect them from loss, as well.

Back up and protect. In this electronic age, it’s likely that you already have arrangements to back up important files off-site, preferably 50 or more miles away, with the ability to view them online. But what about records that you keep on-site containing sensitive customer and employee information? Take steps to prevent looters from gaining access to these records in the event you must evacuate.

Keep in touch. Even if your company never suffers a disaster, it may still be vulnerable to disruptions in the supply chain. Arranging for back-up suppliers, deliveries, and other important services may help prevent someone else’s bad fortune from becoming your own. It’s also a good idea to prepare a list with contact information for your employees, Naperville accounting advisor,vendors, Naperville Investment advisor and others with whom you do business. Make sure your managers have copies of the list and keep them at home.

1–2) The Wall Street Journal, April 16, 2010; September 11, 2009

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

How Interest Rates Can Influence Financial Decisions

Few Aspects of Economy Have as Much Effect on Spending, Saving

Throughout much of the past decade, the Federal Reserve has relied on its control of short-term interest rates to influence economic activity. Some would even say that it has made some fairly unconventional moves: Like cutting the federal funds rate 11 times in 2001. Or keeping rates under 2% for much of the decade. Or taking them almost to zero in response to the 2008 credit crisis, along with other monetary moves designed to push down long-term rates.1–2

On the surface, adjusting interest rates might seem to be an overly simple solution for steering the world’s most powerful economy: Growing slowly or not at all? Cut interest rates. Growing too fast? Raise interest rates. Economy seems fine? Leave rates alone.

The reality is that there are few mechanisms in any economy that can influence behavior more effectively than interest rates. Consider how low interest rates can affect important financial decisions.
Decisions About Spending and Saving
Interest rate vs money balanceImage by RambergMediaImages via Flickr


Low interest rates create incentives for people and businesses to spend money, especially on purchases that may require financing. Interest rates directly affect borrowing costs, so lower rates may help increase the affordability of big-ticket items, such as automobiles and real estate. For example, home sales tend to be higher when mortgage rates are 5% than when they are 10%.3

The Fed’s primary motivation for cutting interest rates is usually to stimulate spending. Lowering rates may help encourage businesses to purchase capital goods and durable equipment; households may find that they are able to purchase items that were previously out of reach.

By contrast, higher interest rates reduce incentives to spend and increase the potential benefits of saving. In theory, higher interest rates dampen consumer demand. If the supply of goods and services remains the same, then the result should be less upward pressure on prices — in other words, less inflation.
Decisions About Debt Maturities

When short-term interest rates are low relative to long-term rates, it raises the risk that institutions and individuals seeking to own debt may overinvest in bonds with longer maturities in an attempt to increase yields. If interest rates rise, the value of existing bonds can be expected to fall. The longer the maturity, the greater the effect may be on the value of the bond. The principal value of bonds fluctuates with market conditions. Bonds redeemed prior to maturity may be worth more or less than their original cost.
Decisions About Risk

When rates are low, investors may turn to higher-risk investments in pursuit of greater return potential. Over longer periods, more investors may be lured to riskier positions until an unhealthy percentage of economic resources is exposed to too much risk. The more economic resources that are pursuing speculative investments, the greater the risk that a financial crisis could occur.

We’re likely to see low interest rates persist for the foreseeable future. When it comes to your portfolio, it’s important to strike a balance between making decisions based on your long-term interests and making decisions based on the current influence of interest rates.

1, 3) Federal Reserve, 2010
2) The Wall Street Journal, November 4, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an accountant in Naperville or a Naperville Financial Planning advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Dispelling Umbrella Insurance Myths

It’s easy to tell yourself that you’ll probably never need to purchase extra liability insurance. After all, your chances of being hit with a multimillion-dollar lawsuit may be fairly slim. And besides, wouldn’t the liability coverage on your standard homeowners and auto insurance policies be enough to protect you against a claim or a lawsuit?

Before you make such an assumption — and underestimate the importance of having enough liability protection — consider that between 2001 and 2007, the average jury award for all liability cases increased by almost 62%.1 If you had liability coverage, how much did it increase during this period?

Unfortunately, there are a number of misconceptions about umbrella liability insurance that could cause you to be underinsured.

“My other policies should provide enough coverage.” Standard auto and homeowners insurance policies typically offer between $300,000 and $500,000 in liability coverage. If you’re ever found liable for an amount greater than these limits, you may need to use your home, financial assets, and even your future earnings to satisfy a legal judgment. An umbrella policy acts as an additional layer of protection above the limits of your primary coverage. To qualify for an umbrella liability insurance policy, you generally must purchase the maximum liability coverage available on your auto and homeowners policies, which serve as the deductible for the umbrella policy.

“I’m not at risk of being sued.” If you have a swimming pool, have teenagers living at home, employ workers in your home, own a dog, or entertain frequently, you may have a higher risk of becoming the target of a personal liability lawsuit. Dog bites alone accounted for more than one-third of all homeo
The dogImage via Wikipedia
wners insurance liability claims in 2009. More than 50% of dog bites occur on the dog owner’s property.2

“It’s too expensive.” Umbrella policies typically charge a few hundred dollars a year for $1 million of coverage. The benefits can be used to pay jury awards, plaintiff medical expenses, and legal fees, up to the policy limits. The appropriate amount of coverage for your situation will depend on personal factors, but it’s generally recommended that you have liability coverage at least equal to your net worth.

Omitting umbrella liability insurance from your risk-management strategy could be a costly mistake. The cost is low relative to the additional coverage it may offer.

1–2) Insurance Information Institute, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from a Naperville CPA or a Naperville Asset Management professional. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 16, 2011

Making Money Market Funds Work for You

Some investors turn to money market funds when they are concerned about market volatility. At the start of 2009, in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, the amount of cash held in money market funds exceeded the money in stock mutual funds for the first time in more than a decade.1

Money market funds may carry less risk than stocks, but investing in them as a reaction to market volatility also carries risk: You could miss out on any potential gains when the market begins to recover.

Meet the Money Market

Money market funds are mutual funds that invest in cash-alternative assets, usually short-term debt. They seek to preserve a value of $1 per share.

Investors may use money market funds on a temporary basis to hold proceeds from the sale of assets while they determine where to reinvest the funds. Because money market funds aim to maintain liquidity and may offer higher yields than bank savings accounts, they can also provide a place to hold your emergency fund. It’s always a good idea to have enough cash saved to carry you through a financial emergency.

Less Risk May Mean Low Returns

Money market funds may have a place in your portfolio, but it’s usually not a good idea to keep the bulk of your wealth in low-yielding cash instruments because you are concerned about market volatility. As you can see in the chart, trying to choose the appropriate moment to flee or reinvest in stocks can be a costly practice that may cause you to miss out on market gains.

Low rates of return may also make money market funds less ideal for long-term investing. Any time the after-tax yield is lower than the rate of inflation, your investment may be losing purchasing power.

When considering money market funds, it’s important to remember that lower risk usually translates to lower returns. Before you invest in money market funds, be sure to evaluate whether or not they may help you reach your long-term goals.

Money market funds are neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although money market funds seek to preserve the value of your inv
100 pxImage via Wikipedia
estment at $1 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in such a fund.

Mutual funds are sold only by prospectus. Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus, which contains this and other information about the investment company, can be obtained from your Naperville financial services professional. Be sure to read the prospectus carefully before deciding whether to invest.

1) The New York Times, January 10, 2009

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from a Naperville Accounting firm. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Consider Your Retirement Needs, but Don’t Forget Your Retirement Wants

MarketWatchImage via Wikipedia
You might have read or heard that you need to replace about 80% of your pre-retirement income to maintain your standard of living in retirement. Although some research validates this guideline, consider that half of today’s retirees say their spending is higher or about the same as it was when they were working.1–2

The idea that you may need less income in retirement considers that your income tax burden may be lower when you quit working and that you probably are not contributing a large chunk of your salary to retirement plans. Variables that can influence the replacement ratio — positively or negatively — include your living expenses, overall debt level, health-care costs, and whether you will receive an employer-provided pension.

Rather than focusing on how much money you’ll need to get by in retirement, take some time to envision a retirement lifestyle that you can really get excited about. Unless you plan to spend retirement being frugal, there’s a good chance that you could need more than 80% of your pre-retirement income to fund the lifestyle you seek.

More Time, More Money?

Retirement may be the first time in your life when you are free to travel, play golf, go back to school, focus on hobbies, and pursue other interests that you simply didn’t have time for during your working years.

What a disappointment it would be to retire and finally have the time, but not the money, to do as you please. If you would find it difficult to afford your ideal retirement lifestyle on your current income, it could be an indication that you are underestimating how much income you’ll need in retirement.
Changing Needs

As we grow older, what once may have been considered a luxury can become a necessity. In their list of “basic needs,” more than half of baby boomers include an Internet connection, special occasion gifts, and pet care. Many baby boomers would add family vacations, dining out, professional haircuts/coloring, movies, and their children’s or grandchildren’s education to the list of basic needs.3 And for 98% of baby boomers, health-care coverage is not a luxury but a basic need, one that they are extremely concerned about being able to afford.4

Underestimating Costs and Spending

The danger of underestimating how much you expect to spend in retirement is that it could lead you to save too little or invest too conservatively during your working years. Among the 46% of workers who have attempted to calculate how much money they will need for retirement, 44% made changes to their retirement savings strategies as a result, with the majority of changes involving saving or investing more.5

To prepare for a retirement that you can truly look forward to, consider the luxuries that your retirement-needs calculation may not account for. It could mean the difference between living well and just getting by.

1) CNNMoney, October 8, 2009
2, 5) Employee Benefit Research Institute, 2010
3) MarketWatch, August 6, 2010
4) Society for Human Resource Management, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as Naperville tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent Naperville Retirement Planning professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, May 6, 2011

Eye on Japan's Recovery Within a Recovery

Just days before the Great Tohoku Earthquake, Japan’s central bank was expressing optimism that the nation’s economy was returning to a moderate growth path after a bout with chronic deflation that has dragged on for two decades.1

Now the Japanese government is estimating that the damage caused by the 9.0 temblor and the resulting tsunami and nuclear accident that devastated Japan’s northeast coast on March 11, 2011, may surpass $309 billion. That price tag — more than double the damage from Hurricane Katrina, which ravaged the U.S. Gulf Coast in 2005 — would make this the costliest natural disaster on record.2
ReverseImage via Wikipedia


Although Japan has been in the economic doldrums since the early 1990s, suffering from an aging population (it was the only major nation not to experience a baby boom after World War II), the country plays a critical role in global commerce. Its nearly $6 trillion economy is the third largest, behind China and the United States, and accounts for nearly 9% of global economic output.3–4

The human toll of the disaster is heartbreaking, with perhaps 10,000 confirmed dead, nearly twice that number still missing, and hundreds of thousands displaced.5 Yet this event could serve as a turning point for Japan’s economy. Rebuilding could create investment opportunities, help break the cycle of deflation, and provide a paradigm-shifting jolt that may help a new Japan emerge from the rubble.

But in the near and medium term, Japan will face many challenges that could send ripples through the global economy.

Stabilizing the Yen

In the days after the quake, the Japanese yen surged in chaotic trading, hitting an all-time high on March 16. Two days later, the G-7 nations staged an unusual intervention to help bring the yen’s value down against other currencies.6

A similar currency spike occurred after the 1995 Kobe earthquake, when insurance companies had to buy yen to pay claims, driving up the value. This recent surge may have been driven by speculators who anticipated the yen would rise in the aftermath.7

A strong yen is seen as harmful to Japan’s export-driven economy. Prices for Japanese goods are expected to rise because they have been made more scarce by the country’s lost productivity. The combination of a strong yen and higher prices could cause Japan’s exports to lose market share to lower-priced competitors.
Supply-Chain Interruptions

Japan is a key supplier of equipment, mainly related to transportation and machinery. It supplies 14% of the world’s automotive exports and is an important source of parts for U.S. car makers.8 A shortage of just a few parts can bring an assembly line to a halt. This could lead to temporary plant closings while new supply chains are established. If Japan can’t restart production on key exports, it could create openings for its competitors.

Japan is the world’s biggest steel exporter. A drop in production is anticipated but unlikely to affect the world steel market because there is still slack capacity from the Great Recession. Major mills in 64 nations are operating at 82% capacity.9 Again, this could create an opening for Japan’s steel-making competitors.

Japan is the source of 60% of the world’s silicon wafers, a building block for computer chips. Two factories wiped out in the disaster accounted for 25% of world supply.10 Japan also supplies 90% of a special resin used to make printed circuit boards.

The risks associated with investing on a worldwide basis include differences in financial reporting, currency exchange risk, as well as economic and political risk unique to the specific country. These risks may result in greater share price volatility. Shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.

High Saving Rate

Japan may be in prime shape to pay for rebuilding. It has an abundance of yen-denominated assets, as evidenced by its high personal saving rate, which has averaged almost 17% since 1980.12 The high saving rate may be due to the nation’s persistent economic woes, which have wrought low wages and deflation. (Deflation in particular creates an incentive to save because goods become cheaper over time.) This means that reconstruction may commence regardless of the near-term prospects for Japan’s economy, which is likely to slump.

Tragedies like the one unfolding in Japan may be unpredictable, but they are inevitable. It’s important not to overreact to such events, but to position your portfolio to withstand — and perhaps benefit — when they strike.

1, 4, 6–11) The Wall Street Journal, February 28, 2011; March 25, 2011; March 19, 2011
2) Associated Press, March 23, 2011
3, 12) Haver Analytics, 2011
5) NHK World, March 24, 2011

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from a Naperville Accountant or Naperville Investment Services advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Another Economic Stimulus

Temporary Incentives Could Affect Naperville Businesses of All Sizes

Although Congress was unable to tackle the controversial issue of future income tax rates before the 2010 midterms, it quietly passed a little-noticed tax package: the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (H.R. 5297). Here’s a roundup of some of the bill’s major provisions.

Lending support — A $30 billion lending fund was created to make inexpensive credit available to small businesses. The loans will be made available through community banks.1

Bonus depreciation — The 50% first-year bonus depreciation, which expired at the end of 2009, was extended through 2010. It allows 50% of the cost of a depreciable item to be deducted as an expense in the first year of ownership. The additional year of bonus depreciation for equipment with a recovery period of 10 years or longer, and for tangible property used to transport people or equipment, was extended through 2011.2

Maximum first-year depreciation caps for new vehicles increased to $11,060 for passenger automobiles purchased and put into service in 2010. The maximum deduction for light trucks and vans remains at $11,160.3

Section 179 expensing — The maximum deduction related to qualified Code Sec. 179 property doubled to $500,000 for tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011. The law also temporarily modified the definition of qualified Section 179 property to include up to $250,000 of qualified real property (qualified leasehold improvement property, restaurant property, and retail improvement property).4

Small-business income tax credits — The law extended the carryback period on general business tax credits to five years, and they can be applied to both regular tax liability and AMT tax liability.5

Start-up expense deduction — In 2010 only, start-up costs related to the creation of a new business can be expensed instead of having to be amortized. The maximum expense that can be claimed is $10,000.6

Self-employed tax break — In 2010 only, self-employed people are allowed to deduct their health insurance premiums before computing their payroll taxes.7

1) U.S. Small Business Administration, 2010
2–7) CCH, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from a Naperville accountant. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, April 25, 2011

The Tax Year Calendar

Here are some important dates for the 2011 Tax Year:

January
Seal of the Internal Revenue ServiceImage via Wikipedia

    18 –     Fourth quarter 2010 estimated tax due. Use Form 1040-ES.
    31 –     Deadline for employers to provide copies of Forms W-2 and 1099 for 2010 to employees.
February
    15 –     If you claimed exemption from income tax withholding last year on the Form W-4 you gave your employer, you must file a new Form W-4 by February 15 to continue your exemption for another year.
    28 –     Deadline for farmers and fishermen who have a balance due on their taxes to file their 2010 individual income tax returns and pay the balance due without penalties.
March
    15 –     Deadline for 2010 Naperville corporate tax returns (Forms 1120, 1120-A, and 1120-S) or to request an extension using Form 7004.
April
    18 –     Deadline to file 2010 Naperville individual income tax returns (Form 1040, 1040A, or 1040EZ) and any taxes owed, or to file for an automatic 6-month extension.
    18 –     Last day to contribute to a traditional IRA, Roth IRA, or SEP-IRA for the 2010 tax year.
    18 –     First quarter 2011 estimated tax due. Use Form 1040-ES.
    18 –     Deadline to file 2010 trust tax returns (Form 1041) or to request an automatic extension.
    18 –     Deadline to file 2010 partnership tax returns (Form 1065) or to request an automatic extension.
June
    15 –     Deadline for U.S. citizens living abroad to file individual tax returns and pay any tax, interest, and penalties due, or to request a 4-month extension (Form 4868).
    15 –     Second quarter 2011 estimated tax due. Use Form 1040-ES.
September
    15 –     Third quarter 2011 estimated tax due. Use Form 1040-ES.
October
    1 –     Deadline for existing employers to establish a SIMPLE IRA plan.
    17 –     If you were given a 6-month extension to file your income tax return for 2010, file Form 1040, 1040A, or 1040EZ and pay any tax, interest, and penalties due.
    17 –     Final deadline to file 2010 partnership tax return if you were given a 6-month extension.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Roth IRA Conversion Mistakes Can Be Costly

Roth IRAs have experienced a spike in popularity over the past decade. Between 2000 and 2009, the number of households owning Roth IRAs increased by an average of 6.3% per year, the fastest-growing rate of ownership among all types of IRAs.1

What distinguishes a Roth IRA from other types of IRAs — and what may be responsible for its rise in popularity — is its ability to provide a tax-free income in retirement and its exemption from required minimum distribution rules.

Although contributions to a Roth IRA are made with after-tax dollars (income eligibility limits apply), qualified distributions are free of federal income tax as long as all conditions are met and regardless of how much growth the account experiences (under current tax law).

One popular way to fund a Roth IRA is by transferring assets from a traditional IRA or an employer-sponsored retirement plan. This type of transaction, called a Roth IRA conversion, is simple in theory but can be complicated in practice. If you make any of these mistakes, you could lose some key advantages.

Paying the conversion taxes with funds from the account you are converting. When tax-deferred assets are converted to a Roth IRA, you must report them as income on your tax return for the year in which the conversion takes place and pay the taxes owed.

Unless you’re older than 59½, it’s generally not advisable to pay the income taxes using money from the account you are converting. Withdrawing money from a tax-deferred plan to pay the conversion taxes before age 59½ would be considered an early distribution and thus may be subject to a 10% early-withdrawal penalty. Consider paying the taxes from a non-tax-deferred account.

Even if you are older than 59½, it could take years before the conversion begins to pay off. If you use some of the tax-deferred assets you are converting to pay the income taxes, you are reducing the amount of money available to pursue potential investment returns.

Failing to consider a “recharacterization” if the account loses value. If the value of the converted assets declines after the conversion, you may be able to “undo” the conversion using a process called recharacterization. This enables you to amend your tax return and obtain a refund of the conversion taxes that you paid. The deadline to recharacterize is October 15 of the year after the year in which the original Roth IRA conversion took place.

You can reconvert the assets to a Roth IRA later at the presumably lower value (which may result in a smaller tax liability) as long as you wait 30 days after the recharacterization date or until the calendar year following the year in which you made the initial Roth IRA conversion, whichever is longer.

Violating the five-year rule. To qualify for a tax-free and penalty-free distribution of earnings and converted assets, Roth IRA distributions must meet the five-year holding requirement and take place after age 59½ or result from the owner’s death, disability, or a first-time home purchase ($10,000 lifetime maximum). The rules governing the five-year holding requirement for converted assets are complex. Before you take any specific action, be sure to consult with your Naperville tax professional.

1) Investment Company Institute, 2010

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. © 2011 Emerald Connect, Inc.
Enhanced by Zemanta